Winning Attorneys are Talking
“My firm tried to compile notes on judges for years – with no success. This is just what we need.”
“This site lets me research a judge in a way I never could before.”
Overview of Tentative Rulings
The Los Angeles County Superior Court invented tentative rulings in the 1960s. Originally, they made motion practice more efficient by allowing parties to avoid an appearance upon learning which way a court was leaning, assuming the indicated result was acceptable.
Attorneys could call the court and listen to a looped recording of the next day’s tentative rulings. Now, many departments post tentative rulings via their local court website.
- Frabil 690015 371 Straight Line Bro 28 Med Light Spinning Combo
- Icebreaker Mens Long Sleeve 260 Tech Half Zip - 104372
- Marine Metal B15 Power Bubbles Air Pump Aerator 22337
- Nikita Pilatus (White) Women's Snowboard Pants
- Professional's Choice SMBII Boots Charcoal prof Small S Sport Medicine SMB II
- Scientific Anglers Fly Line Bonefish Intermediate Line
- ZEUS BSC (CAMPAGNOLO COPY) VINTAGE 1 THREADED STEEL HEADSET, VVGC
- Zeus chainring 44T 3 32 119 BCD Vintage Road Bike NOS
- ZEUS CRITERIUM (CAMPAGNOLO COPY) VINTAGE 5-7 SPEED REAR DERAILLEUR, VGC
- Zeus Criterium crankset with 48 52 teeth and 170 length from the 1970s
The simplest of tentative rulings indicate nothing more than an intent to grant or deny. Thanks to hard-working judges, tentative rulings have evolved greatly over the past two decades.
Today, many tentative rulings go far beyond a simple ‘grant’ or ‘deny’ and are as thorough and well-written as published decisions from the California Court of Appeal or the California Supreme Court.
In fact, because the higher courts often focus on narrowly-framed issues, tentative rulings from trial court judges often provide a broader analysis.
Why Research Tentative Rulings?
Researching tentative rulings can:
- help you prepare a more thorough report to your client or carrier
- illustrate how a particular judge has handled specific issues in the past
- reveal which cases your judge finds most persuasive on a given topic
- address issues for which there is little or no appellate authority
- provide a quick overview of issues you’re not familiar with